I am sick and tired of the miscreants threatening us with "PLANDEMICS". Let's start by issuing wanted posters for the folks responsible for developing these diseases, fund them with crowd funding, and END THIS CHARADE before someone gets hurt. Tax dollars are being transferred to freaks in the labs making these bio-weapons, instead of providing bona fide health care. ENOUGH ALREADY. Thanks for lighting them up for us, Nicolas.
Sasha commented "There are numerous regulatory “industry guidance” documents published before 2015 that cite FDA’s regulatory knowledge (from numerous failed attempts at developing mRNA products) that these products cause ....""
so I asked AI to find these FDA documents; if I just post some here, from 35yrs ago
"1. "Points to Consider in Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (1991, FDA/NIH)
This was the earliest major regulatory document establishing that nucleic acid and cell-based therapies require safety scrutiny. It identified risks including uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues. It applied to retroviruses and ex vivo modified cells, not mRNA products."
one may note " uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues."
2. "Guidance for Industry: Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (March 1998, FDA/CBER)
This is the most substantive pre-2015 document and is publicly available. It explicitly listed the following safety concerns that must be evaluated before clinical trials:
• Biodistribution to non-target tissues — sponsors must test whether vector/genetic material travels beyond the injection site to other organs
• Gonadal tissue distribution — concern about germline effects
• Insertional mutagenesis — risk that inserting genetic material into the genome could disrupt normal genes, potentially causing cancer
• Immune reactions — including severe inflammatory responses
• Replication-competent virus contamination risks
• Toxicity from lipid or other delivery systems — the document specifically noted that "added materials such as liposomes, or changes in pH or salt content, may alter the toxicity"
3. "Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials — Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events" (November 2006, FDA/CBER)
This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years, depending on the vector, and specified a minimum of five years of annual examinations followed by up to ten more years of patient queries. The reason for this extraordinary duration of monitoring was the acknowledged risk of: Hallorancg
• Delayed-onset cancer from insertional mutagenesis
• Delayed immune reactions
• Organ damage appearing long after administration
if one notes "This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years,"
4. "Preclinical Assessment of Investigational Cellular and Gene Therapy Products" (November 2013, FDA/CBER)
This document, published in 2013, provided detailed recommendations for preclinical safety assessment and specifically cited the 1998 guidance as a foundational reference, while expanding requirements for biodistribution testing and toxicology in animal models. Archive
The FDA's own presentation slides for this guidance listed the following as known safety concerns that must be tested for:
The FDA listed potential safety concerns for gene therapy products as: "vector/virus biodistribution to non-target tissues; level of viral replication and persistence in non-target tissues; inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis and/or oncogenicity; and transgene-related concerns." FDA
The same slides listed concerns for therapeutic vaccine/adjuvant products specifically: "Systemic toxicity — including immune-mediated toxicity, autoimmune response, induction of pro-inflammatory response/cytokine release, organ toxicity, hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis, potential 'off-target' toxicity, and adjuvant-related toxicity." FDA
again, one can note "inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis"
sadly, it seems some sort of stroke occurred in the memory banks; some sort of reformatting of the hard drive of institutional memory; so it all became "safe and effective" and "just carry on chaps"
We had no medical consumer protection of what all stuff, additives, were in the mRNA or DNA Spike Protein Covid-19 vials.
We had no local lab accessing any vial that required freezing storage at -70C to -90C for randomized testings.
We had no information of the source of "raw material" (bat, mice, human, fish, plant, animal) that were treated to make the lipid/fat wrappings around the Spike Protein, and if the latter was a synethic Spike Protein.
So we had no transparency of what hot experimental stuff was being shipped to any Covid-19 vial manufacturer and of any vaccine supplies coming from.subcontravtors, too. And they want blind obedience for us to be injected again, for the human being attack.
Thanks Nick for your tireless efforts to educate the ignorant and bring us real news. Sadly, I suspect, we will all pretty soon be murdered at will, by those who have the power or wish to do it, for what the murderers like to call the public (our own) good.
What after everything we have been through & everything we now know about vxneens & big harms are they still allowed to mfg these biological weapons of mass destruction.
Here we go again..these guys don't know when to stop...
psychopaths never stop.
Just buy some hypochlorus acid !
That or Chlorine Dioxide
I have that too!
I am sick and tired of the miscreants threatening us with "PLANDEMICS". Let's start by issuing wanted posters for the folks responsible for developing these diseases, fund them with crowd funding, and END THIS CHARADE before someone gets hurt. Tax dollars are being transferred to freaks in the labs making these bio-weapons, instead of providing bona fide health care. ENOUGH ALREADY. Thanks for lighting them up for us, Nicolas.
We can trust nothing these characters do, it’s all preplanned and very dangerous.
Such Bullshit, again...why anyone would give credence to it is mind-boggling!
And where can one buy Griffithsin?
Now Supplements makes a Red Algae supplement. I buy it on Amazon.
Hmmm… strange coincidence but Amazon and other retailers have removed Griffithsin from retail sale since May 2026. Surely a coincidence?
Dr Malone posted this about the media theatre event earlier today. You may want to review his history lesson: https://curativabay.substack.com/p/the-hantavirus-theater-continues?r=vkjt6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
covid was a practice run -cha ching
from this post https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/anthony-fauci-will-not-be-prosecuted
Sasha commented "There are numerous regulatory “industry guidance” documents published before 2015 that cite FDA’s regulatory knowledge (from numerous failed attempts at developing mRNA products) that these products cause ....""
so I asked AI to find these FDA documents; if I just post some here, from 35yrs ago
"1. "Points to Consider in Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (1991, FDA/NIH)
This was the earliest major regulatory document establishing that nucleic acid and cell-based therapies require safety scrutiny. It identified risks including uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues. It applied to retroviruses and ex vivo modified cells, not mRNA products."
one may note " uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues."
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2. "Guidance for Industry: Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (March 1998, FDA/CBER)
This is the most substantive pre-2015 document and is publicly available. It explicitly listed the following safety concerns that must be evaluated before clinical trials:
• Biodistribution to non-target tissues — sponsors must test whether vector/genetic material travels beyond the injection site to other organs
• Gonadal tissue distribution — concern about germline effects
• Insertional mutagenesis — risk that inserting genetic material into the genome could disrupt normal genes, potentially causing cancer
• Immune reactions — including severe inflammatory responses
• Replication-competent virus contamination risks
• Toxicity from lipid or other delivery systems — the document specifically noted that "added materials such as liposomes, or changes in pH or salt content, may alter the toxicity"
_______________________________________________________________________________________
next, from 20yrs ago, 2006
3. "Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials — Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events" (November 2006, FDA/CBER)
This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years, depending on the vector, and specified a minimum of five years of annual examinations followed by up to ten more years of patient queries. The reason for this extraordinary duration of monitoring was the acknowledged risk of: Hallorancg
• Delayed-onset cancer from insertional mutagenesis
• Delayed immune reactions
• Organ damage appearing long after administration
if one notes "This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years,"
_________________________________________________________________________________
then from 13 yrs ago
4. "Preclinical Assessment of Investigational Cellular and Gene Therapy Products" (November 2013, FDA/CBER)
This document, published in 2013, provided detailed recommendations for preclinical safety assessment and specifically cited the 1998 guidance as a foundational reference, while expanding requirements for biodistribution testing and toxicology in animal models. Archive
The FDA's own presentation slides for this guidance listed the following as known safety concerns that must be tested for:
The FDA listed potential safety concerns for gene therapy products as: "vector/virus biodistribution to non-target tissues; level of viral replication and persistence in non-target tissues; inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis and/or oncogenicity; and transgene-related concerns." FDA
The same slides listed concerns for therapeutic vaccine/adjuvant products specifically: "Systemic toxicity — including immune-mediated toxicity, autoimmune response, induction of pro-inflammatory response/cytokine release, organ toxicity, hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis, potential 'off-target' toxicity, and adjuvant-related toxicity." FDA
again, one can note "inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis"
______________________________________________________________________________
sadly, it seems some sort of stroke occurred in the memory banks; some sort of reformatting of the hard drive of institutional memory; so it all became "safe and effective" and "just carry on chaps"
Who is surprised? Not me.
Most severe infections, sepsis are the result of a dysregulated immune response due to previous vaccinations. Use antihistamines.
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR241819
We had no medical consumer protection of what all stuff, additives, were in the mRNA or DNA Spike Protein Covid-19 vials.
We had no local lab accessing any vial that required freezing storage at -70C to -90C for randomized testings.
We had no information of the source of "raw material" (bat, mice, human, fish, plant, animal) that were treated to make the lipid/fat wrappings around the Spike Protein, and if the latter was a synethic Spike Protein.
So we had no transparency of what hot experimental stuff was being shipped to any Covid-19 vial manufacturer and of any vaccine supplies coming from.subcontravtors, too. And they want blind obedience for us to be injected again, for the human being attack.
Ivermectin is a cheap, safe and effective treatment.
Thanks Nick for your tireless efforts to educate the ignorant and bring us real news. Sadly, I suspect, we will all pretty soon be murdered at will, by those who have the power or wish to do it, for what the murderers like to call the public (our own) good.
What after everything we have been through & everything we now know about vxneens & big harms are they still allowed to mfg these biological weapons of mass destruction.
RFK Jr silent on this???
surprised? … what did he do about the PREP ACT? nobody’s coming to save anybody.