That’s because there have been zero consequences for what they did during Covid. Until the people rise up and string up Fauci and Baric they won’t stop.
I am sick and tired of the miscreants threatening us with "PLANDEMICS". Let's start by issuing wanted posters for the folks responsible for developing these diseases, fund them with crowd funding, and END THIS CHARADE before someone gets hurt. Tax dollars are being transferred to freaks in the labs making these bio-weapons, instead of providing bona fide health care. ENOUGH ALREADY. Thanks for lighting them up for us, Nicolas.
So I read where this virus is not transmited from person to person. That it is contracted from mouse or rat feces. So, why is there all the hype about having a vaccine? unless they have done gain of function and created a contages one...
I have horses and chickens and touch and breathe rat poop dust every day for 30 years. Maybe I should “knock on wood “, but, I have never had a rat borne illness. I did get several bouts of “salmonella type “ illnesses that I believe were from CHICKENS poop…a unwell chicken which is gone now and no more terrible “bouts “ occurring.
Ah ha! You’ve got the real story, Nicolas. Problem, reaction, and guess what the solution has already been developed!? Not that we’ve seen that before. 🧐
We all have the tendency to paint issues with a broad brush. That is to see things one way for intellectual simplicity. “All pharmaceuticals are bad” or “I don’t trust any vaccine.” It is even more tempting to take a negative view on all new technology when the product launch in humans fails to a large degree.
These old mental saws could apply to mRNA vaccines. Halma et al have published a scoping review of lipid nanoparticle-mRNA products with fair balance causing the reader to consider future possibilities.
I’ve had a lot of success with it. Knocks out Covid immediately. Also cleared up long COVID symptom of pins and needles in my calves after a 5 day course. Kept me from getting a nasty virus at my son’s. Ivermectin is an impressive medicine.
Sasha commented "There are numerous regulatory “industry guidance” documents published before 2015 that cite FDA’s regulatory knowledge (from numerous failed attempts at developing mRNA products) that these products cause ....""
so I asked AI to find these FDA documents; if I just post some here, from 35yrs ago
"1. "Points to Consider in Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (1991, FDA/NIH)
This was the earliest major regulatory document establishing that nucleic acid and cell-based therapies require safety scrutiny. It identified risks including uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues. It applied to retroviruses and ex vivo modified cells, not mRNA products."
one may note " uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues."
2. "Guidance for Industry: Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (March 1998, FDA/CBER)
This is the most substantive pre-2015 document and is publicly available. It explicitly listed the following safety concerns that must be evaluated before clinical trials:
• Biodistribution to non-target tissues — sponsors must test whether vector/genetic material travels beyond the injection site to other organs
• Gonadal tissue distribution — concern about germline effects
• Insertional mutagenesis — risk that inserting genetic material into the genome could disrupt normal genes, potentially causing cancer
• Immune reactions — including severe inflammatory responses
• Replication-competent virus contamination risks
• Toxicity from lipid or other delivery systems — the document specifically noted that "added materials such as liposomes, or changes in pH or salt content, may alter the toxicity"
3. "Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials — Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events" (November 2006, FDA/CBER)
This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years, depending on the vector, and specified a minimum of five years of annual examinations followed by up to ten more years of patient queries. The reason for this extraordinary duration of monitoring was the acknowledged risk of: Hallorancg
• Delayed-onset cancer from insertional mutagenesis
• Delayed immune reactions
• Organ damage appearing long after administration
if one notes "This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years,"
4. "Preclinical Assessment of Investigational Cellular and Gene Therapy Products" (November 2013, FDA/CBER)
This document, published in 2013, provided detailed recommendations for preclinical safety assessment and specifically cited the 1998 guidance as a foundational reference, while expanding requirements for biodistribution testing and toxicology in animal models. Archive
The FDA's own presentation slides for this guidance listed the following as known safety concerns that must be tested for:
The FDA listed potential safety concerns for gene therapy products as: "vector/virus biodistribution to non-target tissues; level of viral replication and persistence in non-target tissues; inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis and/or oncogenicity; and transgene-related concerns." FDA
The same slides listed concerns for therapeutic vaccine/adjuvant products specifically: "Systemic toxicity — including immune-mediated toxicity, autoimmune response, induction of pro-inflammatory response/cytokine release, organ toxicity, hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis, potential 'off-target' toxicity, and adjuvant-related toxicity." FDA
again, one can note "inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis"
sadly, it seems some sort of stroke occurred in the memory banks; some sort of reformatting of the hard drive of institutional memory; so it all became "safe and effective" and "just carry on chaps"
"This clearly angered WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus" I think that the former work of the honorable Dr. Tedros, as a Marxist terrorist, should be pointed out, for those not familiar with his background.
Here we go again..these guys don't know when to stop...
That’s because there have been zero consequences for what they did during Covid. Until the people rise up and string up Fauci and Baric they won’t stop.
and they made...so much money
It never was about the money!! Hello!
Exactly. And most regular people still parrot the nonsense we were fed years ago, they will comply again.
psychopaths never stop.
They will only stop when they reach their total kill number goal !!!
Just buy some hypochlorus acid !
That or Chlorine Dioxide
I have that too!
What exactly is the danger with this oh so scary new bioweapon?
I am sick and tired of the miscreants threatening us with "PLANDEMICS". Let's start by issuing wanted posters for the folks responsible for developing these diseases, fund them with crowd funding, and END THIS CHARADE before someone gets hurt. Tax dollars are being transferred to freaks in the labs making these bio-weapons, instead of providing bona fide health care. ENOUGH ALREADY. Thanks for lighting them up for us, Nicolas.
We can trust nothing these characters do, it’s all preplanned and very dangerous.
covid was a practice run -cha ching
Thanks Nicholas. We salute your scholarship and bravery. Power on!
So I read where this virus is not transmited from person to person. That it is contracted from mouse or rat feces. So, why is there all the hype about having a vaccine? unless they have done gain of function and created a contages one...
That is the only thing that makes sense.
I have horses and chickens and touch and breathe rat poop dust every day for 30 years. Maybe I should “knock on wood “, but, I have never had a rat borne illness. I did get several bouts of “salmonella type “ illnesses that I believe were from CHICKENS poop…a unwell chicken which is gone now and no more terrible “bouts “ occurring.
or they just want more people dead
Exactly!! I just hope enough people have woken up since the Covid farce..
Ah ha! You’ve got the real story, Nicolas. Problem, reaction, and guess what the solution has already been developed!? Not that we’ve seen that before. 🧐
But Peter McCullough says the next rollout of mRNA may be brighter!
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We all have the tendency to paint issues with a broad brush. That is to see things one way for intellectual simplicity. “All pharmaceuticals are bad” or “I don’t trust any vaccine.” It is even more tempting to take a negative view on all new technology when the product launch in humans fails to a large degree.
These old mental saws could apply to mRNA vaccines. Halma et al have published a scoping review of lipid nanoparticle-mRNA products with fair balance causing the reader to consider future possibilities.
Most severe infections, sepsis are the result of a dysregulated immune response due to previous vaccinations. Use antihistamines.
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR241819
Ivermectin is a cheap, safe and effective treatment.
I’ve had a lot of success with it. Knocks out Covid immediately. Also cleared up long COVID symptom of pins and needles in my calves after a 5 day course. Kept me from getting a nasty virus at my son’s. Ivermectin is an impressive medicine.
And where can one buy Griffithsin?
Now Supplements makes a Red Algae supplement. I buy it on Amazon.
Hmmm… strange coincidence but Amazon and other retailers have removed Griffithsin from retail sale since May 2026. Surely a coincidence?
Another one
Keep up the awesome work!!!!
from this post https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/anthony-fauci-will-not-be-prosecuted
Sasha commented "There are numerous regulatory “industry guidance” documents published before 2015 that cite FDA’s regulatory knowledge (from numerous failed attempts at developing mRNA products) that these products cause ....""
so I asked AI to find these FDA documents; if I just post some here, from 35yrs ago
"1. "Points to Consider in Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (1991, FDA/NIH)
This was the earliest major regulatory document establishing that nucleic acid and cell-based therapies require safety scrutiny. It identified risks including uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues. It applied to retroviruses and ex vivo modified cells, not mRNA products."
one may note " uncontrolled cell proliferation, immune reactions, and spread to unintended tissues."
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2. "Guidance for Industry: Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (March 1998, FDA/CBER)
This is the most substantive pre-2015 document and is publicly available. It explicitly listed the following safety concerns that must be evaluated before clinical trials:
• Biodistribution to non-target tissues — sponsors must test whether vector/genetic material travels beyond the injection site to other organs
• Gonadal tissue distribution — concern about germline effects
• Insertional mutagenesis — risk that inserting genetic material into the genome could disrupt normal genes, potentially causing cancer
• Immune reactions — including severe inflammatory responses
• Replication-competent virus contamination risks
• Toxicity from lipid or other delivery systems — the document specifically noted that "added materials such as liposomes, or changes in pH or salt content, may alter the toxicity"
_______________________________________________________________________________________
next, from 20yrs ago, 2006
3. "Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials — Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events" (November 2006, FDA/CBER)
This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years, depending on the vector, and specified a minimum of five years of annual examinations followed by up to ten more years of patient queries. The reason for this extraordinary duration of monitoring was the acknowledged risk of: Hallorancg
• Delayed-onset cancer from insertional mutagenesis
• Delayed immune reactions
• Organ damage appearing long after administration
if one notes "This 2006 guidance required developers to observe patients for delayed adverse events for up to 15 years,"
_________________________________________________________________________________
then from 13 yrs ago
4. "Preclinical Assessment of Investigational Cellular and Gene Therapy Products" (November 2013, FDA/CBER)
This document, published in 2013, provided detailed recommendations for preclinical safety assessment and specifically cited the 1998 guidance as a foundational reference, while expanding requirements for biodistribution testing and toxicology in animal models. Archive
The FDA's own presentation slides for this guidance listed the following as known safety concerns that must be tested for:
The FDA listed potential safety concerns for gene therapy products as: "vector/virus biodistribution to non-target tissues; level of viral replication and persistence in non-target tissues; inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis and/or oncogenicity; and transgene-related concerns." FDA
The same slides listed concerns for therapeutic vaccine/adjuvant products specifically: "Systemic toxicity — including immune-mediated toxicity, autoimmune response, induction of pro-inflammatory response/cytokine release, organ toxicity, hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis, potential 'off-target' toxicity, and adjuvant-related toxicity." FDA
again, one can note "inappropriate immune activation; potential for insertional mutagenesis"
______________________________________________________________________________
sadly, it seems some sort of stroke occurred in the memory banks; some sort of reformatting of the hard drive of institutional memory; so it all became "safe and effective" and "just carry on chaps"
Dr Malone posted this about the media theatre event earlier today. You may want to review his history lesson: https://curativabay.substack.com/p/the-hantavirus-theater-continues?r=vkjt6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Not just 'NO' but 'HELL NO'!
"This clearly angered WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus" I think that the former work of the honorable Dr. Tedros, as a Marxist terrorist, should be pointed out, for those not familiar with his background.