34 Comments
User's avatar
Tom Haviland's avatar

Go, go, go Nicolas! Keep going on these shows and putting the pressure on the FDA and CDC to take these "bad jabs" off the shelves! And if the hosts of these shows ask you if you know anybody else who who like to come on their show, I would be happy to go on their show and brief the results of my latest "Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Survey" to help drive a stake in the heart of these "clot shots!" If you need my email address, our good friend Dr. Peter McCullough has it. -Tom

Expand full comment
tara's avatar
6hEdited

They are putting the MRNA covid vax in your food you need to do this right now.......

Visit........ https://t.co/U12ZPbCw7L

Expand full comment
Alio McDavis's avatar

Thank you Nicholas for getting up every morning, putting on that suit and playing full on day after day after day for humanities sake. It is making a difference. If the human race survives, it will be the voices for Knowledge that saved us. If it doesn't.......

Oh well. There are a billion other worlds out there and I'm certain there are a few having similar problems. It won't be like we're out a job.

Expand full comment
albert venezio's avatar

Thank you Nicholas!

Expand full comment
Thomas Marsh's avatar

Absolutely ABOUT TIME!!!!!

Expand full comment
Alison H.'s avatar

This is huge. Of course the 'inert placebo" will not be another vaccine, as the others have been...right?

Expand full comment
JanC1955's avatar

… unless they suddenly redefine the meaning of “inert placebo” … something we should closely monitor.

Expand full comment
Truthseeker's avatar

Right- because Inert placebo meant historically a placebo that contained aluminum

And aluminum is a well known neuro toxin

Expand full comment
Stephanie Gibbs Dunlap's avatar

EXACTLY!

Expand full comment
Steve C's avatar

Exactly.... all the other crap--aluminum adjuvants, etc... will be in the placebos, just no siRNAs.... Some placebo, huh?

Expand full comment
Dale Buchberger covid nerd's avatar

what about OLD vaccines that were NEVER Placebo tested like MMR!!

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Just “ new” vaccines? They need to go back and used saline placebos on ALL the poisons. Let’s get the truth out. Might as well because new vaccines won’t make it past the saline placebo trial.

Citizens need to understand that the childhood schedule vaccines are not tested with saline placebo. That information should be written on every consent form. I’m not even sure most doctors know this?

I learned this when I read “ Turtles All The Way Down”. I raised 3 children & I’m an avid reader. How can this information be concealed & FDA consider ANY vaccine safe?

They don’t KNOW what the true side effects of any of these are. What a scam! 🙈

Expand full comment
Steve C's avatar

I know on its face this sounds like an improvement, but the overall design and timelines of these trials will be where the battle will be fought. You think big pHarma and DARPA, ad vomitous , will just roll over? Hardly.

Expand full comment
White Fang's avatar

If there is no fight , there is no winning!

Expand full comment
Steve C's avatar

Agreed. I m saying we're just getting started.

Expand full comment
White Fang's avatar

Yup

Expand full comment
Prof Kylie O’Brien's avatar

What about the existing vaccines that are causing so much damage? Aren’t they going to be subjected to RCTs?

Expand full comment
Dr. John's avatar

Not good enough. ALL jabs should be stopped IMMEDIATELY.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

Having the FDC investigate vaxxines is like having the Rockefeller Commission investigate the Warren Commission.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Gibbs Dunlap's avatar

RFK Jr. Has been ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, all Along!

Expand full comment
R Milhous Willemse's avatar

Good work go ahead❗️

Expand full comment
RLM's avatar
19hEdited

While requiring a control group for vaccine testing is a vast step in the right direction, it does not eliminate the absolute need for MEDICAL FREEDOM. Remdesivir was given approval but then produced such dismal results it acquired a nickname: 'Run, death is near. ' Initial studies showed too high levels of adverse events, esp. elevated liver enzymes. For those who wish to avoid a cure that is worse than the disease, RCTs are wonderful, just not perfect.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Agree. And why does Ivermectin not count for a known “ anti- viral, in this article? A lot of questions from the scientists themselves on the allowed approval of this drug. I thought it was pulled. Many compared it to Fauci’s AZT drug w/ AIDS.

https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug

Expand full comment
RLM's avatar

When remdesivir first was released, physicians noted the weak study that had been submitted to FDA. So I dug it up and was astonished. I didn't keep a copy, alas, so I can't quote exactly, but there were +/- 55 patients plus control group, and 23% showed elevated liver enzymes. Another similar number suffered similar adverse events. Appalling.

BTW, I have friends and relatives in Seattle, so I found your moniker humorous.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

FDA & Big Pharma lived an untouchable existence for a long time. Fudged numbers & weak proof of evidence in so many studies. They could basically fake safety by urging “ more research needed”, in the conclusion. What a scam. And the really good ethical scientists were eliminated from funding & grants. They might tell the truth.

I still love Seattle, but it’s changed a lot in 50 years. People say “get out”, but my roots are here. Plus, I was here first. 😂 I’m not the last GOP, it just feels like it sometimes. Lots of good people still here on both sides. I’m glad you got a giggle. What’s better than laughing? I’m in Des Moines, 10 min. south of airport.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

So we’re going to cheer that at least there will be placebo groups in the unnecessary pharmaceutical category that causes death and injury!

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

“should” in legal terms means “shall” or “must”? So ,the mRNA shots “should” be withdrawn, shouldn’t that mean “must.” Surely they must be removed.

Expand full comment