12 Comments
User's avatar
Allie's avatar

I’ve witnessed Dr. Malone seeming to want to be the center of attention in various hearings. The ACIP panel should have someone with an equal ego who will speak out as forcefully as Dr. Malone. Dr. McCullough would probably fit that profile. I’d like to see Dr. Kory on that panel. How about Dr. McKernan? How about a pathologist like Dr. Cole? We need more clinical people on the panel and it should not be heavily weighted with policy people. Statisticians and epidemiologists are needed as well to be able to interpret study results correctly.

Expand full comment
Gerald D. Williams's avatar

I would have selected Dr Malone to be the Pandemic Czar, reporting to the White House.

The role of that position would be to prevent the Trump Admin from being tricked into panic over some new bio-weapon.

Expand full comment
AMV's avatar

Dr McCullough should be on the ACIP panel. 👍 100% drug ads must be pulled off advertising. Money keeps truths quiet!

Expand full comment
Gerald D. Williams's avatar

RFK Jr. has bigger plans for Dr PMC. And RFK Jr. also follows Dr Kory.

However, Dr McCullough doesn't want to be part of the Trump Admin, if they aren't set on getting rid of the Jab. However, we are moving in that direction.

Ending the EUA for mRNA jabs for Covid and promoting cheap alternatives would help.

Ending advertising of prescription drugs and mRNA vaccines would also help.

Note that on May 15, Trump nominated Dr Janette to be Asst. Secretary of Health, despite RFK Jr.'s opposition. Grok just informed me of that decision. Hopefully Dr Janette will get the same rejection as she did for US Surgeon General.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Roberts's avatar

Someone commented that Dr. McCullough should be on this panel. He and I have been twin guests on a podcast at two different times. He, like me, is a true disciple in the interest of the health of Americans. He should have long ago been functioning in a major capacity at HHS, FDA, or CDC. I have communicated this to those agencies and their OIG offices more than once. The American public should be made aware of this!

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

Malone has no business on ACIP since he owns patents related to vaccines. That is the type of conflict of interest that the others were removed from the panel for.

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

The ban to prevent tv advertising of tobacco products was successful. No free speech for commercial interests of tobacco companies. Couldn’t some of the same arguments be successful to ban Rx advertising?

Expand full comment
Gracie Howlett's avatar

Have been saying that for months Dr McCullough! The minute the pharmaceutical adds are removed from mainstream media, suddenly they will discover all the information that you've been talking about for the last 5 ears! Thank you for all you do

Expand full comment
Benjamin Roberts's avatar

All well and good on cutting out drug manufacturers direct advertising to patients. But how much will that achieve when doctors are mostly the middlemen for these manufacturers in selling their products, having been granted 'free samples' trips, event tickets, and other 'inducements?'

Also the ad promos always say "and if you have questions ask your doctor." What do you think they will say if they have been provided 'treats' by that company?

Expand full comment
Loraine Robins's avatar

Can TWC products eg. the Spike Detox be sold and delivered to us in Australia or are they prevented from entering Australia by Customs?

Expand full comment
Loraine's avatar

Amen it's about time!! And how people don't see/hear when a commercial ends and they list the side effects the rate of speech goes into hyperdrive to squeeze them all in, sometimes with that last one being death....

No surprise there.......

Expand full comment
Liberty's avatar

Or Dr Nicolas on ACIP Committee. Either, Or

Expand full comment