Thank you. Perhaps this concept can be expanded to testing children for genetic predispositions to the inability to metabolize certain vaccine ingredients and other toxins as a "heads up". I'm all for finding genetic markers as this can be an indicator for things to avoid and making lifestyle changes. Where we get into trouble is when we try to modify the genome ourselves, intentionally with mRNA, or accidently with DNA contaminated products.
I am in the EU. Some time ago, I asked my doctor to include a Vitamin D level in my blood test. He was surprised, but did it. Next, I asked for a HOMA-IR test…..they do NOT perform this in my country…no lab, and even the diabetes foundation here indicates that this is not done. I can only imagine my doctor’s response when I ask for an APOE test.
Oh No Dear Doctor!!! Thank you for a backhanded reminder about fear-based medical fallacies. Of all humane beings, you are not someone I can imagine intentionally propagates the baseless belief that YOU — and your patients, and subscribing followers — or loved ones, need to succumb to genetic determinism.
It is the theoretical platform for political divides geared to acceptance or rejection of commercial and biodefense fallacies. Are we humans really just disposable lab animals based on fixed symptom biomarkers and druggable targets given the predictability of incomplete models?
Why do you write about a commitment to being an authoritative voice — and yet a medically-dependent victim of genetic determinism who buys into predetermined disease onset and progression based on one marker of disease? It’s a variable not a fixed marker, unless you think symptom associations represent health or its potential.
Your other work and leadership suggests you know that historic disease theories are not wholistic or individual health realities. I hope your co-writing a book on the history of religious culture of vaccines hasn’t admitted you to the expert class of priest of that cult.
That is to say, I am surprised your article reads like a fear-driven mistake or AI mediated hallucination. Because it celebrates (?) JAMA group-think to decidedly miss the most significant health science perspectives in principle, and proven (evidence based) long term studies in real world clinical practices
Should I laugh or cry as your post promotes one time testing to a set life course… of predictable disease models and mono-therapies that don’t consistently reverse AD (like lower cost root cause prevention and treatment protocols can).
Your MD perspective on biology is too narrow (here) for anyone’s good, except the few big owners of premium priced pharma products and testing services, those aiming to grow a $1.2 Billion market by many times over within 5-10 years.
The clown in me might ask: Did GSK sponsor you? I suspect not, because I see you as a resilient man of integrity, distinguished too by willingness if not immediate capacity to learn… beyond standard horizons fragmenting professional expertise… in theory (of course)?
Many of us understand the fear, and sadness from losing so many friends and family to AD despite expensive drug protocols. We try our best. And pros are conditioned to seek quick fixes like ideas about theoretical disease predictability. It is the flywheel of Big Pharma Big Investor profits.
But you, me and many of your followers know that we are all potentially more alive and better than that. That is, as long as we have free and informed choice, the desire to learn and ability to adapt.
I have always respected you as a leader in open science and open minded learning. So this article seems out of place, misplaced and mistaken.
May I speak to you briefly sometime, please, about epigenetic self-regulation?
May I suggest with respect that your most loyal readers stop, think and defer from following your prescriptive one-and-done testing protocol?
When my mom was diagnosed with Alzheimers many years ago and at the urging of her doctor I entered into a study in NY. They checked my blood and, thankfully, found that I didn’t have the APOE indicators. My 11 still living siblings strangely didn’t want to know so they didn’t join the study. I felt that any new research might lead to a better understanding of how it progresses in families.
Mom’s doctor had another patient who was deep into Alzheimers and awaiting death in a nursing home. That patient went out of country to get a new treatment not available here. The doctor was shocked as when he next saw the patient, he was living on his own and appeared quite happy. The treatment involved laying blood rich tissue from his abdomen onto his brain. Her doctor was trying to get approval to test it on her but she died before he could get the approval. Haven’t heard anything in the many years since. Has any progress been made on that front?
My mother, my father, my grandmother and my brother all died of or with dementia. My daughter, who works with the elderly, thought I was getting early onset dementia in my fifties. I am 78 now and am not doing that anymore although my word recall sucks when I get tired.
I believe that all this dementia we are seeing is the way chronic mercury toxicity manifests in the elderly, the same way autism is the worst case scenario for it in children. There are plenty of other conditions as well. It depends how much you got exposed to, how susceptible you are and where it wound up in your body. The inability to excrete mercury very well is genetic.
Dr. Boyd Hayley's claims about what mercury does when you add it to brain cells, plus the Youtube video from the University of Calgary went a long way in convincing me about the mercury. I chelated for ten years with the Andy Cutler protocol and stopped having chronic anxiety and a few other things.
Recently I discovered some hidden amalgam left over from the "crime against humanity" dental work I had from the time I was eight or so. Bummer! I got that removed and I am at it again as I don't want to wind up drooling in a chair in a memory care unit.
Dr. McCullough, when I hear you talk about the number of vaccines you got, I think, "Wow, he must be a good excreter!" You look pretty good. I have an eye for intention tremors and other mercury symptoms. (Sen Blumenthal seems to have a tremor by the way.) Maybe you got all of your shots from single dose vials.
This is my website which will lead to all the other places to learn about the Cutler protocol.
Thank you for your post. Very important. My father also died of dementia, so did one of his sisters. The doctors warned the next generation to be on edge for sympoms. They tried to prove it was hereditary (no testing done). But my dad and his sister had 15 other siblings and none had that, so... maybe i'm off here but dad had taken tons of first-generation anthihistamines thoughout his life (a very bad toxic load for the brain) but was doing relativey fine before being started on yearly flu shots and statins. same for his sister.
Yes. My mother was fine until she moved in to a retirement community and started getting all those flu shots. My father was already a bit loopy. He had a particularly bad dentist he had found who in fact drilled out all my amalgam fillings and replaced them with fresh amalgam. That set me off on my own history of health disaster and who know what that dentist did to my father! My father was also addicted to Neo Synephrine nose drops. He used them several times a day and slept with a bottle under his pillow. Those nose drops were preserved with Thimerosal.
Rebecca, I remember 45 years ago my sister had made a research on mercury in amalgams (which she had plenty of) to prove they were toxic and that she was also allergic to mercury to be able to pass the amalgam removal+replacements under her insurance. - Can you image how sick she felt... though too young to feel that misarable- .She was keeping me updated on this. Anyhow, she won her case with a brick load of information. (no internet then). Uncanny that my father was also using a lot of the "sniffers" as he called them... and that your mom started on a regimen of flu shots. Thank you for your testimony and the link. Be blessed!
Blessings of healing and recovery. I believe Dr Chris Exley is the most persecuted going up against yhe establishment. I have only studied it for 25 years and would recommend looking into some of the same covid & autism metal removal/detoxes. I put my article in my repurposed Onion article to avoid censorship and try to make light of such a painful decline.
I've recently restarted my headhunting campaign to try to find the inventors of the patent and will start prayers for your parents miraculous recovery in Yeshua's name.
IMHO, the association is just not strong enough to potentially have someone questioning, “is this it?” for the rest of their lives. If you have a strong family history, you already know you have an elevated risk. Testing negative is reassuring, and I’m certain worth it for those who do, but a negative test shouldn’t change behavior. We should all take measures to protect our brains. I do like the idea of longitudinal studies.
I heard a scientific say that the more flu shots you get, the closer to Alzheimer you get. The more sugar (it's even called diabetes type 3), the more you have chances of developping it. And other toxins as mentionned in the comments (fluoride in water? Monsanto's concoctions? air-spread poisons? mRNA? etc.. ). It's more urgent to get unbiaised studies done and available proving these are most likely the cause or contributing factors of mental/nerve decline; ridding the population of this load, and implementing healthy hygiene/regimens, such as REAL food. I have nothing against genetic testing, but it could become a double edged sword to place the guilt on our genes and bad heredity or worse, screening those you don't want to invest on down the line - considered future "useless eaters to be cast out) or genetic editing of any kind (embryos for example). God forbid we ever reach this point, but with this twisted scientific era we're in, I'm expecting a good tool could be used as a weapon. My opinion.
Thank you. Perhaps this concept can be expanded to testing children for genetic predispositions to the inability to metabolize certain vaccine ingredients and other toxins as a "heads up". I'm all for finding genetic markers as this can be an indicator for things to avoid and making lifestyle changes. Where we get into trouble is when we try to modify the genome ourselves, intentionally with mRNA, or accidently with DNA contaminated products.
This was exactly on my mind.
I am in the EU. Some time ago, I asked my doctor to include a Vitamin D level in my blood test. He was surprised, but did it. Next, I asked for a HOMA-IR test…..they do NOT perform this in my country…no lab, and even the diabetes foundation here indicates that this is not done. I can only imagine my doctor’s response when I ask for an APOE test.
Oh No Dear Doctor!!! Thank you for a backhanded reminder about fear-based medical fallacies. Of all humane beings, you are not someone I can imagine intentionally propagates the baseless belief that YOU — and your patients, and subscribing followers — or loved ones, need to succumb to genetic determinism.
It is the theoretical platform for political divides geared to acceptance or rejection of commercial and biodefense fallacies. Are we humans really just disposable lab animals based on fixed symptom biomarkers and druggable targets given the predictability of incomplete models?
Why do you write about a commitment to being an authoritative voice — and yet a medically-dependent victim of genetic determinism who buys into predetermined disease onset and progression based on one marker of disease? It’s a variable not a fixed marker, unless you think symptom associations represent health or its potential.
Your other work and leadership suggests you know that historic disease theories are not wholistic or individual health realities. I hope your co-writing a book on the history of religious culture of vaccines hasn’t admitted you to the expert class of priest of that cult.
That is to say, I am surprised your article reads like a fear-driven mistake or AI mediated hallucination. Because it celebrates (?) JAMA group-think to decidedly miss the most significant health science perspectives in principle, and proven (evidence based) long term studies in real world clinical practices
Should I laugh or cry as your post promotes one time testing to a set life course… of predictable disease models and mono-therapies that don’t consistently reverse AD (like lower cost root cause prevention and treatment protocols can).
Your MD perspective on biology is too narrow (here) for anyone’s good, except the few big owners of premium priced pharma products and testing services, those aiming to grow a $1.2 Billion market by many times over within 5-10 years.
The clown in me might ask: Did GSK sponsor you? I suspect not, because I see you as a resilient man of integrity, distinguished too by willingness if not immediate capacity to learn… beyond standard horizons fragmenting professional expertise… in theory (of course)?
Many of us understand the fear, and sadness from losing so many friends and family to AD despite expensive drug protocols. We try our best. And pros are conditioned to seek quick fixes like ideas about theoretical disease predictability. It is the flywheel of Big Pharma Big Investor profits.
But you, me and many of your followers know that we are all potentially more alive and better than that. That is, as long as we have free and informed choice, the desire to learn and ability to adapt.
I have always respected you as a leader in open science and open minded learning. So this article seems out of place, misplaced and mistaken.
May I speak to you briefly sometime, please, about epigenetic self-regulation?
May I suggest with respect that your most loyal readers stop, think and defer from following your prescriptive one-and-done testing protocol?
When my mom was diagnosed with Alzheimers many years ago and at the urging of her doctor I entered into a study in NY. They checked my blood and, thankfully, found that I didn’t have the APOE indicators. My 11 still living siblings strangely didn’t want to know so they didn’t join the study. I felt that any new research might lead to a better understanding of how it progresses in families.
Mom’s doctor had another patient who was deep into Alzheimers and awaiting death in a nursing home. That patient went out of country to get a new treatment not available here. The doctor was shocked as when he next saw the patient, he was living on his own and appeared quite happy. The treatment involved laying blood rich tissue from his abdomen onto his brain. Her doctor was trying to get approval to test it on her but she died before he could get the approval. Haven’t heard anything in the many years since. Has any progress been made on that front?
Have a great and blessed day!
My mother, my father, my grandmother and my brother all died of or with dementia. My daughter, who works with the elderly, thought I was getting early onset dementia in my fifties. I am 78 now and am not doing that anymore although my word recall sucks when I get tired.
I believe that all this dementia we are seeing is the way chronic mercury toxicity manifests in the elderly, the same way autism is the worst case scenario for it in children. There are plenty of other conditions as well. It depends how much you got exposed to, how susceptible you are and where it wound up in your body. The inability to excrete mercury very well is genetic.
Dr. Boyd Hayley's claims about what mercury does when you add it to brain cells, plus the Youtube video from the University of Calgary went a long way in convincing me about the mercury. I chelated for ten years with the Andy Cutler protocol and stopped having chronic anxiety and a few other things.
Recently I discovered some hidden amalgam left over from the "crime against humanity" dental work I had from the time I was eight or so. Bummer! I got that removed and I am at it again as I don't want to wind up drooling in a chair in a memory care unit.
Dr. McCullough, when I hear you talk about the number of vaccines you got, I think, "Wow, he must be a good excreter!" You look pretty good. I have an eye for intention tremors and other mercury symptoms. (Sen Blumenthal seems to have a tremor by the way.) Maybe you got all of your shots from single dose vials.
This is my website which will lead to all the other places to learn about the Cutler protocol.
https://www.maybeitsmercury.com/
Thank you for your post. Very important. My father also died of dementia, so did one of his sisters. The doctors warned the next generation to be on edge for sympoms. They tried to prove it was hereditary (no testing done). But my dad and his sister had 15 other siblings and none had that, so... maybe i'm off here but dad had taken tons of first-generation anthihistamines thoughout his life (a very bad toxic load for the brain) but was doing relativey fine before being started on yearly flu shots and statins. same for his sister.
Yes. My mother was fine until she moved in to a retirement community and started getting all those flu shots. My father was already a bit loopy. He had a particularly bad dentist he had found who in fact drilled out all my amalgam fillings and replaced them with fresh amalgam. That set me off on my own history of health disaster and who know what that dentist did to my father! My father was also addicted to Neo Synephrine nose drops. He used them several times a day and slept with a bottle under his pillow. Those nose drops were preserved with Thimerosal.
Rebecca, I remember 45 years ago my sister had made a research on mercury in amalgams (which she had plenty of) to prove they were toxic and that she was also allergic to mercury to be able to pass the amalgam removal+replacements under her insurance. - Can you image how sick she felt... though too young to feel that misarable- .She was keeping me updated on this. Anyhow, she won her case with a brick load of information. (no internet then). Uncanny that my father was also using a lot of the "sniffers" as he called them... and that your mom started on a regimen of flu shots. Thank you for your testimony and the link. Be blessed!
Peter
Blessings of healing and recovery. I believe Dr Chris Exley is the most persecuted going up against yhe establishment. I have only studied it for 25 years and would recommend looking into some of the same covid & autism metal removal/detoxes. I put my article in my repurposed Onion article to avoid censorship and try to make light of such a painful decline.
REVERSAL WORLD PATENT
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2002043507A3/en
Retaliation against the inventors:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/ct-autism-anjum-usman-discipline-met-20141229-story.html
*Hit piece showcasing more of the nutritional content to try:
https://quackwatch.org/cases/board/med/usman/complaint/
Repurosed Onion article
https://legallinkconfidential.com/1biden1i23me1juking1joking100jukeboxzyxwredditattnattention1me2-song
For a potential 1 stop shop solution that I've heard is great for removing toxins, explore this product:
https://masterpeacebyhcs.com/
I've recently restarted my headhunting campaign to try to find the inventors of the patent and will start prayers for your parents miraculous recovery in Yeshua's name.
-Geoff
💖💖💖
IMHO, the association is just not strong enough to potentially have someone questioning, “is this it?” for the rest of their lives. If you have a strong family history, you already know you have an elevated risk. Testing negative is reassuring, and I’m certain worth it for those who do, but a negative test shouldn’t change behavior. We should all take measures to protect our brains. I do like the idea of longitudinal studies.
I heard a scientific say that the more flu shots you get, the closer to Alzheimer you get. The more sugar (it's even called diabetes type 3), the more you have chances of developping it. And other toxins as mentionned in the comments (fluoride in water? Monsanto's concoctions? air-spread poisons? mRNA? etc.. ). It's more urgent to get unbiaised studies done and available proving these are most likely the cause or contributing factors of mental/nerve decline; ridding the population of this load, and implementing healthy hygiene/regimens, such as REAL food. I have nothing against genetic testing, but it could become a double edged sword to place the guilt on our genes and bad heredity or worse, screening those you don't want to invest on down the line - considered future "useless eaters to be cast out) or genetic editing of any kind (embryos for example). God forbid we ever reach this point, but with this twisted scientific era we're in, I'm expecting a good tool could be used as a weapon. My opinion.