Of course the MRNA platform should be withdrawn. Frankly it is not fit for human use, is a recipe for auto-immunity , cancer and neurological damage and does not confer immunity.
There is no upside to it and frankly I think it a scandal that it was ever inflicted on humanity in the first place. I consider it the most bogus fraudulent snake-oil, ever to have been peddled to an unsuspecting public by mendacious carpet baggers posing as medical experts.
Your are so right, Shelagh AH. But it is a so obvious route to trans-humanism - which is why it is being so vigorously pushed on Humanity. When Harari gleefully proclaimed at a WEF meeting some years ago “humans are hack-able” no doubt he had the artificial mRNA technology in mind. The COVID injections, fraudulently aka “vaccines”, were the first example of a mass applied trans-human intervention.
Dr. Drew was recommending COVID shots to people long after the avalanche of reports of adverse reactions and death from those shots. I don’t trust anything he has to say about anything medical.
Apologies, but WTAF??? Dr. Drew, you’re using Paxlovid to treat yourself?? We’ve known for years that Paxlovid causes COVID-19 rebound. This guy is on TV selling Wellness products and he is using Paxlovid. Total. Clown. World.
Did you notice some of Dr. McCullough’s facial expressions when Dr. Drew spoke about his “long COVID” and how he was treating himself with Paxlovid. He did not look thrilled, yet he said nothing to counteract anything that Dr. Drew said.
The mRNA jabs should have never been released on humans. They’re poison, they’re dangerous, and they are depopulating our world, and Dr Drew as far as I’m concerned, you shouldn’t even have this interview because you were recommending the Covid jabs so I’m done with you.
I for one, would like to see the RNA platform completely thrown out. Even pet “vaccines” are on the market now using the RNA platform. Vets aren’t paying attention, or informing the pet owners, when they are using the RNA by platform vaccines. We don’t need heart issues and more cancer in our pets anymore than we do in humans. Just ban the stuff completely. We’ll be safer for it!
When these first appeared, one caution was that the animals treated with mRNA "vaccines" saw a very short effective period after the shot. This is OK for steers on the feedlot, not so useful for people .
Well if you look at Swine Flu or Vioxx, you see what the numbers were for recall…. There’s no group of people it makes sense to use it for. Recently they said only the elderly or people with serious health conditions should get the mRNA shot at this, or people over 65…. Nonsense: the elderly, frail and hospitalized patients are the most vulnerable!! Steve Kirsch already cleared that question up by running the statistical studies on nursing homes in California. There the covid jab resulted in devastation of the elderly, specifically.
Yes time to do what was done to Swine Flu, Vioxx, and Cigarette Smoking: properly identify them for what they are, and because it is a failed medical concept, remove it like so many other treatments that failed.
I believe the mRNA platform should be preserved so we the people can inject it into public health officials, government lackeys, media leaders, and corporate magnates who promote it. I predict they will be needing many many boosters in the near future(to protect grandma).
Yes it should be thrown into the garbage pile where it belongs. Stop pussy footing around. There is far more facts that have shown it to be destructive to human life than for it. One does not have to have some f#cking medical degree to see the writing on the wall. Come on people, Get your integrity back and step up to the plate!
For many years Wikipedia even showed that under moderna the history in 2016 that their platform would never be safe in humans. I was actually amazed at how long it stayed up on Wikipedia until someone took it down. You can still find it on the way back machine under the history section of the Wikipedia moderna reference. You can also find how the platform spread to all the organs in the body. Apparently this was well known in 2016 or 2017 for sure. So the whole idea has already been proven unsafe but did that stop anybody?? It probably did stop some ethical folks who got discharged from the company.
Though I've been aware of Dr. McC since The COVID hit and gratefully followed much of his advice on preventing/treating the infection and avoiding the clotshots, I doubt I need to throw away 22 minutes of my life watching this video, since I have a general sense of where these two "classically trained" (in western medicine) doctors stand on the cut-burn-(and especially)poison approach to "healing."
The only thing I can figure is that the western medicine indoctrination our medical students receive before they set out in the world gets into their very bones in a way that is almost impossible to eradicate. I've been cautious around MDs my entire adult life for this reason. I learned early on through personal experience they do NOT have all or even most of the answers to healing humans. I wish the western medical profession good luck reestablishing credibility and trust with the masses while simultaneously promoting ongoing human experiments with the mRNA platform.
I've been blessed with the gift of prophesy (Jeremiah 33:3, 1 Corinthians 12:10) and despite being a known #Covid contrarian, the answer is an emphatic NO.
Altering the Altering from the Alter:
Our DNA belongs to G-d. HE wants 50.1% controlling ownership of ModeRNA to fix the problem, then it sinks to a biblical tithe of 10% in the best & only deal in ModeRNA's tiny deepstate history. The little "m" messenger in mRNA is messianic. GOØD wins every time especially End Times Eschotology. Read your bible.
monozygotic twins have the same DNA, some of the diseases whose main cause is declared genetic and always confirmed for a long time, does not have the same confirmation among monozygotic twins, among twins even mental illnesses and the impact caused by covid-19 present sufficient differences to declare genetics rather weak.
The genetic cause, on the other hand, is continuously declared statistically proven among people who do not have the same DNA,
All this contradiction does not seem to have much weight either in the discussions on the genetic causes of diseases or in the discussions of mRNA research.
The mRNA research immensely widespread throughout the world, would appear to be caused by a hypothesis of genetic cause all in all weak, (visibly weak among monozygotic twins) but is pushed immensely everywhere, in fact it appears to be a sort of last resort for the pharmaceutical market and for biological warfare, that is, by making a modification on the DNA lead to (common) diseases it can open the market to effective antagonist drugs but not to "natural" diseases but instead useful for precisely those (common) diseases caused by the DNA modification made previously. The strategic and military threat of making everyone's health depend on DNA modifications also opens up to similar countermeasures of which one country could have the keys (the countermeasures) while another does not, and be threatened or defeated (plundered).
The question from the article... "What do you think? Can the public trust mRNA drug and vaccine developers?" THE ANSWER IS HELL NO. I will pray for forgiveness for my honest outburst, and saying what I really mean.
These scientists who've searching for a vaccine for corona viruses for decades know by now that it DOES NOT work, and only ended up killing all the ferrets after a "challenge" virus was given because these animals immune systems were decimated! But wait! There's more! Along came Covid-19 as a result of the patented (Baric, UNC at Chapel Hill) chimeric SARS-CoV-2 virus that offered up the perfect human experimentation to see if it worked better on humans than on ferrets.
It didn't. No "warp speed" here, folks. Reading the history of vaccines is a valuable project for anyone who wants to see how all of this has played out.
Another good read is a 46-page paper by Ralph S. Baric (UNC at Chapel Hill) titled: Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society. He wrote this paper in 2006 (3 years after the SARS-CoV-2 patents were issued to him and the University. It was published in 2007 in Working Papers for Synthetic Genomics. It's an eye-opener and a good example of how many of these scientists think with regard to creating these types of vaccines and drugs.
Should all mRNA-platform based gene therapies be withdrawn? YES!! Today!
I like to get blood tested. I go to my doctor what do I tell him? What kind of test do I need? Am I over reaction? I didn’t get the vaccine but I did get Covid.
Of course the MRNA platform should be withdrawn. Frankly it is not fit for human use, is a recipe for auto-immunity , cancer and neurological damage and does not confer immunity.
There is no upside to it and frankly I think it a scandal that it was ever inflicted on humanity in the first place. I consider it the most bogus fraudulent snake-oil, ever to have been peddled to an unsuspecting public by mendacious carpet baggers posing as medical experts.
Your are so right, Shelagh AH. But it is a so obvious route to trans-humanism - which is why it is being so vigorously pushed on Humanity. When Harari gleefully proclaimed at a WEF meeting some years ago “humans are hack-able” no doubt he had the artificial mRNA technology in mind. The COVID injections, fraudulently aka “vaccines”, were the first example of a mass applied trans-human intervention.
Dr. Drew was recommending COVID shots to people long after the avalanche of reports of adverse reactions and death from those shots. I don’t trust anything he has to say about anything medical.
Apologies, but WTAF??? Dr. Drew, you’re using Paxlovid to treat yourself?? We’ve known for years that Paxlovid causes COVID-19 rebound. This guy is on TV selling Wellness products and he is using Paxlovid. Total. Clown. World.
Did you notice some of Dr. McCullough’s facial expressions when Dr. Drew spoke about his “long COVID” and how he was treating himself with Paxlovid. He did not look thrilled, yet he said nothing to counteract anything that Dr. Drew said.
Yeah I noticed that, too. 😕
It also has a black box warning.
The mRNA jabs should have never been released on humans. They’re poison, they’re dangerous, and they are depopulating our world, and Dr Drew as far as I’m concerned, you shouldn’t even have this interview because you were recommending the Covid jabs so I’m done with you.
The LNP delivery system MUST be thrown out!!
I for one, would like to see the RNA platform completely thrown out. Even pet “vaccines” are on the market now using the RNA platform. Vets aren’t paying attention, or informing the pet owners, when they are using the RNA by platform vaccines. We don’t need heart issues and more cancer in our pets anymore than we do in humans. Just ban the stuff completely. We’ll be safer for it!
When these first appeared, one caution was that the animals treated with mRNA "vaccines" saw a very short effective period after the shot. This is OK for steers on the feedlot, not so useful for people .
Well if you look at Swine Flu or Vioxx, you see what the numbers were for recall…. There’s no group of people it makes sense to use it for. Recently they said only the elderly or people with serious health conditions should get the mRNA shot at this, or people over 65…. Nonsense: the elderly, frail and hospitalized patients are the most vulnerable!! Steve Kirsch already cleared that question up by running the statistical studies on nursing homes in California. There the covid jab resulted in devastation of the elderly, specifically.
Yes time to do what was done to Swine Flu, Vioxx, and Cigarette Smoking: properly identify them for what they are, and because it is a failed medical concept, remove it like so many other treatments that failed.
I believe the mRNA platform should be preserved so we the people can inject it into public health officials, government lackeys, media leaders, and corporate magnates who promote it. I predict they will be needing many many boosters in the near future(to protect grandma).
Yes it should be thrown into the garbage pile where it belongs. Stop pussy footing around. There is far more facts that have shown it to be destructive to human life than for it. One does not have to have some f#cking medical degree to see the writing on the wall. Come on people, Get your integrity back and step up to the plate!
For many years Wikipedia even showed that under moderna the history in 2016 that their platform would never be safe in humans. I was actually amazed at how long it stayed up on Wikipedia until someone took it down. You can still find it on the way back machine under the history section of the Wikipedia moderna reference. You can also find how the platform spread to all the organs in the body. Apparently this was well known in 2016 or 2017 for sure. So the whole idea has already been proven unsafe but did that stop anybody?? It probably did stop some ethical folks who got discharged from the company.
Though I've been aware of Dr. McC since The COVID hit and gratefully followed much of his advice on preventing/treating the infection and avoiding the clotshots, I doubt I need to throw away 22 minutes of my life watching this video, since I have a general sense of where these two "classically trained" (in western medicine) doctors stand on the cut-burn-(and especially)poison approach to "healing."
The only thing I can figure is that the western medicine indoctrination our medical students receive before they set out in the world gets into their very bones in a way that is almost impossible to eradicate. I've been cautious around MDs my entire adult life for this reason. I learned early on through personal experience they do NOT have all or even most of the answers to healing humans. I wish the western medical profession good luck reestablishing credibility and trust with the masses while simultaneously promoting ongoing human experiments with the mRNA platform.
I've been blessed with the gift of prophesy (Jeremiah 33:3, 1 Corinthians 12:10) and despite being a known #Covid contrarian, the answer is an emphatic NO.
Altering the Altering from the Alter:
Our DNA belongs to G-d. HE wants 50.1% controlling ownership of ModeRNA to fix the problem, then it sinks to a biblical tithe of 10% in the best & only deal in ModeRNA's tiny deepstate history. The little "m" messenger in mRNA is messianic. GOØD wins every time especially End Times Eschotology. Read your bible.
monozygotic twins have the same DNA, some of the diseases whose main cause is declared genetic and always confirmed for a long time, does not have the same confirmation among monozygotic twins, among twins even mental illnesses and the impact caused by covid-19 present sufficient differences to declare genetics rather weak.
The genetic cause, on the other hand, is continuously declared statistically proven among people who do not have the same DNA,
All this contradiction does not seem to have much weight either in the discussions on the genetic causes of diseases or in the discussions of mRNA research.
The mRNA research immensely widespread throughout the world, would appear to be caused by a hypothesis of genetic cause all in all weak, (visibly weak among monozygotic twins) but is pushed immensely everywhere, in fact it appears to be a sort of last resort for the pharmaceutical market and for biological warfare, that is, by making a modification on the DNA lead to (common) diseases it can open the market to effective antagonist drugs but not to "natural" diseases but instead useful for precisely those (common) diseases caused by the DNA modification made previously. The strategic and military threat of making everyone's health depend on DNA modifications also opens up to similar countermeasures of which one country could have the keys (the countermeasures) while another does not, and be threatened or defeated (plundered).
Yes.
The question from the article... "What do you think? Can the public trust mRNA drug and vaccine developers?" THE ANSWER IS HELL NO. I will pray for forgiveness for my honest outburst, and saying what I really mean.
These scientists who've searching for a vaccine for corona viruses for decades know by now that it DOES NOT work, and only ended up killing all the ferrets after a "challenge" virus was given because these animals immune systems were decimated! But wait! There's more! Along came Covid-19 as a result of the patented (Baric, UNC at Chapel Hill) chimeric SARS-CoV-2 virus that offered up the perfect human experimentation to see if it worked better on humans than on ferrets.
It didn't. No "warp speed" here, folks. Reading the history of vaccines is a valuable project for anyone who wants to see how all of this has played out.
Another good read is a 46-page paper by Ralph S. Baric (UNC at Chapel Hill) titled: Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society. He wrote this paper in 2006 (3 years after the SARS-CoV-2 patents were issued to him and the University. It was published in 2007 in Working Papers for Synthetic Genomics. It's an eye-opener and a good example of how many of these scientists think with regard to creating these types of vaccines and drugs.
Should all mRNA-platform based gene therapies be withdrawn? YES!! Today!
I like to get blood tested. I go to my doctor what do I tell him? What kind of test do I need? Am I over reaction? I didn’t get the vaccine but I did get Covid.